Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 3

Ethics - Essay Example Since these duties would apply to every rational individual, ethics would prevail as individuals would be acting under universal laws that are absolute, therefore, without events of contradictions occurring (Kay, 2007). This paper will examine Maria von Herbert’s interaction with Kant as seen in the reading by Rae Langton, thus pointing out the problems, with Kantian ethics, their severity and how the Kantian can suitably respond. Firstly, it is crucial to examine the details of the letters and the events that followed in order to chronologically assess the situation and pinpoint the main issues. In Rae Langton’s reading, a theme of friendship between Maria von Herbert, a young Austrian and Kant seems to welcome the reader. Herbert is presented as a keen follower of Kant and even with the on-going enmity between Germany and Austria; she still seems to be devoted to Kant’s ideologies. In the season of autumn in 1791, Herbert wrote Kant a letter disclosing her suff ering caused by losing her lover due to revealing certain information to him. Agitated from emotion, she said that she had contemplated suicide but because of Kant’s theory, she had decided otherwise (Langton, 1992:2). Herbert felt that she should confess about a certain truth that she had not told her lover so that she could be at peace with herself. After confessing, the lover turned cold and the love that he had felt for Herbert faded, thus making Herbert miserable. Herbert had fortunately read Kant’s theories and since she was devoted to the Kantian ethics, she had decided not to take her own life as it would be morally unacceptable (Langton, 1992:2). Kantian ethics instructed that every individual was compelled by a duty to do what is morally right despite the consequences. In this context, Kant had argued that committing suicide was going against the categorical imperative, which in itself is a command that demands individuals not to commit suicide (Kant, 1785). Herbert was a staunch follower of Kantian ethics so she felt that it was morally wrong to commit suicide despite the pain and agony she was feeling. Although she had not taken her life, she wanted Kant to reveal to her, the values or worth of living such a miserable life with a lot of emotional pain and no good. She wanted Kant to give her an alternative that could make her feel that her life was worth once again. She also indicated that Kant’s philosophy had not helped her in dealing with her troubles (Langton, 1992:3). The letter evidently moved Kant as it conveyed a theme and a message of truth, virtue and honesty. These were qualities that moved Kant because he believed that speaking the truth was not only an ethical duty to oneself but to others (Mahon, 2009:214). Therefore, he sought a friend who advised him to reply to the letter. Kant talked about the dispute between desiring to keep individuals’ private matters to themselves and the need to openly talk about t hem especially when in a situation of immense love. Kant said individuals had an inward urge that set limits to excessive openness and allowed them to keep some aspects of life locked within them. Kant simply meant that it was ethically allowed for individuals to keep private matters to themselves but this was supposed to be recognised from lying (Langton: 1992: 3). Kant told Herbert that her lover had every right to be angry with her and she had to face the consequences of being dishonest. Kant declined to talk about suicide because he thought that talking

Bomb Squad Guidelines Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Bomb Squad Guidelines - Research Paper Example ene include the establishment of a command, request for emergency services, identification of the hazards at the scene, identification of the witnesses and victims as well as the preservation of any physical evidence that may be considered as potential and transient. With these, it is possible to identify, collect, locate and preserve evidence which is valuable in order for it to undergo examination that makes it possible to produce information that is both useful and effective (Pyrek, 2010). Some of the topics that need to be updated in this book include the areas that are concerned with the collection and examination of debris from an explosion and bombing crime scene. In this sense, there was a need to improve the recognition of consistent evidence as well as the other procedures involved in handling. This also includes the area that is related to training where the amount of information possessed by an individual is supposed to be upgraded. The other area that needs to be upgraded in the book is concerned with the securing of the required resources. This can be done through reevaluation, being aware of the safety alert concerns and the establishment entry and exits paths to be used by personnel. All these practices and procedures are mainly concerned with the evaluation and assessment processes of the procedure (NIJ, 2014). These topics need to be updated because of the importance associated with the proper identification, examination and collection of forensic evidence that is highly relevant. In this way, it will make it possible to ensure the performance of more successful investigations. In this sense, this kind of revision will affect the community that deals with forensic science and the criminal community since it relates to the collection of evidence and preservation in the sense that it will encompass a wide range of areas that include most of the agencies involved in law enforcement, forensic laboratories, fire departments, government agencies and